Jolly Hockey sticks I have been away from typing.
A person with higher nobility and near perfect credentials has alerted me to a salacious story on the steps of Westminster.
Last week a protest was in full throttle concerning a British government proposed ban on certain sex acts to be wiped off our TV and computer screens.
Quote. An amendment to Britain’s Communications Act (2003) put video on demand online pornography under the same regulations that already govern DVD sales and theatrical movie releases. Under the British Board of Film Censors rules, people in Britain are no longer able to pay for pornography that contains spanking, caning, verbal abuse, water sports, female ejaculation, fisting, or face-sitting. End quote.
Yikes…! I wasn’t aware there was a ministerial portfolio for porn, and if so he has choked three quarters of MPs favorite recreation.
One can only marvel at the industrious lengths ministers go to, using valuable taxpayer’s money on such Dickensian acts.
Looking over the shoulder of some MP’s one might see the pages of Fifty Shades of Grey, as much as a report on London’s new proposed airport.
Monty Pythons have been lampooning the Establishment since the Sixties. Their comedic insights remain eternal.
The Minister of Porn proposes female wanking, between morning biscuits and afternoon tea unsavory.
However one senses a sinister trait and recurring theme – why is ok for men to spray their seed with vigorous delight when women aren’t afforded the same luxury?
Women on Top so to speak, presents a threatening call to action by those who claim jobs gone overseas are damaging the Treasury.
These terrible face sitters might seek employment elsewhere and not pay taxes! ; Yet another blow against women and hence the irony.
Charlotte Rose, who was named sex worker of the year in 2013, organized last week’s face-sit-in.
She expands on the idea that this ban, denies female pleasure as well as economics where in an industry women make more money than men.
Perhaps one thing at least MP’s should be concentrating on is lowering college tuition; this might dissuade seeing their daughters on screen making up the balance of their student debt.
However the protest provided a keen sense of humor - face sitting sit in’s, placards that read “We Cum in Peace.” and “Vulvas Don’t Kill People, Revolvers Do.”
I guess at the end of the day where one stands on the issue depends on where one is sits, or is it the other way round?
“
1 comment:
indeed a very good piece, written in one sitting i take it?
i guess the dilemma will be "to sit or not to sit" as the wrong sitting might end up with a very long sitting (in the can...)
Post a Comment